--- xnu/xnu-2050.9.2/libkern/c++/OSObject.cpp
+++ xnu/xnu-1504.7.4/libkern/c++/OSObject.cpp
@@ -87,6 +87,25 @@
 OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 14);
 OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 15);
 
+#ifdef __ppc__
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 16);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 17);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 18);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 19);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 20);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 21);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 22);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 23);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 24);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 25);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 26);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 27);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 28);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 29);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 30);
+OSMetaClassDefineReservedUnused(OSObject, 31);
+#endif
+
 static const char *getClassName(const OSObject *obj)
 {
     const OSMetaClass *meta = obj->getMetaClass();
@@ -96,6 +115,12 @@
 bool OSObject::init()
     { return true; }
 
+#if (!__ppc__) || (__GNUC__ < 3)
+
+// Implemented in assembler in post gcc 3.x systems as we have a problem
+// where the destructor in gcc2.95 gets 2 arguments.  The second argument
+// appears to be a flag argument.  I have copied the assembler from Puma xnu
+// to OSRuntimeSupport.c  So for 2.95 builds use the C 
 void OSObject::free()
 {
     const OSMetaClass *meta = getMetaClass();
@@ -104,6 +129,7 @@
 	meta->instanceDestructed();
     delete this;
 }
+#endif /* (!__ppc__) || (__GNUC__ < 3) */
 
 int OSObject::getRetainCount() const
 {