--- libmalloc/libmalloc-374.60.3/tests/magazine_small_test.c
+++ libmalloc/libmalloc-283/tests/magazine_small_test.c
@@ -11,21 +11,20 @@
 #include "../src/magazine_small.c"
 #include "magazine_testing.h"
 
-// Stubs
-bool aggressive_madvise_enabled = DEFAULT_AGGRESSIVE_MADVISE_ENABLED;
-
 T_GLOBAL_META(T_META_RUN_CONCURRENTLY(true));
 
 static inline void
-small_test_rack_setup(rack_t *rack)
+test_rack_setup(rack_t *rack)
 {
-	test_rack_setup(rack, RACK_TYPE_SMALL);
+	memset(rack, 'a', sizeof(rack));
+	rack_init(rack, RACK_TYPE_SMALL, 1, 0);
+	T_QUIET; T_ASSERT_NOTNULL(rack->magazines, "magazine initialisation");
 }
 
 T_DECL(basic_small_alloc, "small rack init and alloc")
 {
 	struct rack_s rack;
-	small_test_rack_setup(&rack);
+	test_rack_setup(&rack);
 
 	void *ptr = small_malloc_should_clear(&rack, SMALL_MSIZE_FOR_BYTES(512), false);
 	T_ASSERT_NOTNULL(ptr, "allocation");
@@ -40,7 +39,7 @@
 T_DECL(basic_small_teardown, "small rack init, alloc, teardown")
 {
 	struct rack_s rack;
-	small_test_rack_setup(&rack);
+	test_rack_setup(&rack);
 
 	void *ptr = small_malloc_should_clear(&rack, TINY_MSIZE_FOR_BYTES(512), false);
 	T_ASSERT_NOTNULL(ptr, "allocation");
@@ -60,7 +59,7 @@
 T_DECL(basic_small_free, "small free")
 {
 	struct rack_s rack;
-	small_test_rack_setup(&rack);
+	test_rack_setup(&rack);
 
 	void *ptr = small_malloc_should_clear(&rack, SMALL_MSIZE_FOR_BYTES(512), false);
 	T_ASSERT_NOTNULL(ptr, "allocation");
@@ -75,7 +74,7 @@
 T_DECL(basic_small_shrink, "small rack shrink")
 {
 	struct rack_s rack;
-	small_test_rack_setup(&rack);
+	test_rack_setup(&rack);
 
 	void *ptr = small_malloc_should_clear(&rack, SMALL_MSIZE_FOR_BYTES(1024), false);
 	T_ASSERT_NOTNULL(ptr, "allocation");
@@ -92,7 +91,7 @@
 T_DECL(basic_small_realloc_in_place, "small rack realloc in place")
 {
 	struct rack_s rack;
-	small_test_rack_setup(&rack);
+	test_rack_setup(&rack);
 
 	// Allocate two blocks and free the second, then try to realloc() the first.
 	// This should extend in-place using the one-level death row cache that's