--- /dev/null
+++ libmalloc/libmalloc-715.100.22/tests/malloc_zero.c
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <darwintest.h>
+#include <malloc_private.h>
+
+#include "../src/platform.h"
+
+T_GLOBAL_META(T_META_RUN_CONCURRENTLY(true), T_META_TAG_XZONE);
+
+#if !MALLOC_TARGET_EXCLAVES
+// Exclaves don't support disabling zero on free
+T_DECL(malloc_checkfix_zero_on_free, "Test malloc_zero_on_free_disable() SPI",
+		T_META_ENVVAR("MallocZeroOnFree=1"), T_META_TAG_VM_NOT_PREFERRED)
+{
+	// Drive some activity up front
+	void *p1 = malloc(16);
+	T_ASSERT_NOTNULL(p1, "malloc 1");
+	void *p2 = malloc(512);
+	T_ASSERT_NOTNULL(p1, "malloc 2");
+
+	free(p2);
+
+	// Call the checkfix SPI
+	malloc_zero_on_free_disable();
+
+	// Drive some more activity
+	void *p3 = calloc(1, 512);
+	T_ASSERT_NOTNULL(p3, "calloc 1");
+
+	free(p3);
+	free(p1);
+
+	T_PASS("Reached the end");
+}
+#endif // !MALLOC_TARGET_EXCLAVES
+
+static void
+assert_all_zero(char *allocation, size_t size)
+{
+	for (size_t i = 0; i < size; i++) {
+		T_QUIET; T_ASSERT_EQ(allocation[i], '\0', "byte %zu should be 0", i);
+	}
+}
+
+#if !MALLOC_TARGET_EXCLAVES
+T_DECL(malloc_zone_batch_zero_on_free, "malloc_zone_batch_free must zero-on-free",
+		T_META_ENVVAR("MallocZeroOnFree=1"),
+		T_META_ENVVAR("MallocCheckZeroOnFreeCorruption=1"),
+		T_META_ENVVAR("MallocNanoZone=0"),
+		T_META_TAG_VM_PREFERRED)
+{
+	const int n = 3;
+	const size_t size = 272;
+	void *allocations[n];
+	for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+		allocations[i] = malloc(size);
+		T_QUIET; T_ASSERT_NOTNULL(allocations[i], "malloc()");
+		memset(allocations[i], 'a', size);
+	}
+
+	malloc_zone_batch_free(malloc_default_zone(), allocations, n);
+
+	char *allocation = calloc(1, size);
+	T_QUIET; T_ASSERT_NOTNULL(allocation, "calloc()");
+
+	assert_all_zero(allocation, size);
+
+	free(allocation);
+
+	T_PASS("Successful calloc after batch free");
+}
+#endif // !MALLOC_TARGET_EXCLAVES
+
+static void
+check_zeroing_mode(void)
+{
+	// Note: normally we would T_ASSERT that malloc returned non-NULL pointers,
+	// but that may trigger undesired allocations that would interfere with the
+	// intended sequence, so we'll just let them crash instead if that happens
+
+	// Exercise nano support (may still be tiny if !CONFIG_NANOZONE)
+	const size_t nano_alloc_size = 16;
+	void *p1 = malloc(nano_alloc_size);
+	memset(p1, 'a', nano_alloc_size);
+	void *p2 = malloc(nano_alloc_size);
+	memset(p2, 'b', nano_alloc_size);
+
+	free(p1);
+	p1 = malloc(nano_alloc_size); // we probably got the old p1 back
+	// Regardless of whether or not we got the old one, we should be guaranteed
+	// by zero-on-alloc mode that the allocation is zero-filled
+	assert_all_zero(p1, nano_alloc_size);
+	free(p1);
+	free(p2);
+
+	// Exercise tiny support
+	const size_t tiny_alloc_size = 320;
+	p1 = malloc(tiny_alloc_size);
+	memset(p1, 'c', tiny_alloc_size);
+	p2 = malloc(tiny_alloc_size);
+	memset(p2, 'd', tiny_alloc_size);
+
+	free(p1);
+	p1 = malloc(tiny_alloc_size); // we probably got the old p1 back
+	// Regardless of whether or not we got the old one, we should be guaranteed
+	// that the allocation is zero-filled
+	assert_all_zero(p1, tiny_alloc_size);
+
+	// Also check realloc: p2 is most likely next to p1, so if we free p2 and
+	// realloc up p1 it should coalesce.  Regardless of whether or not that
+	// happens, we should be guaranteed that it's zero-filled
+	free(p2);
+
+	void *p3 = realloc(p1, tiny_alloc_size + 64);
+	assert_all_zero(p3, tiny_alloc_size + 64);
+
+	free(p3);
+
+	T_PASS("No issues for zeroing mode");
+}
+
+T_DECL(malloc_zero_on_alloc, "Exercise zero-on-alloc mode",
+		T_META_ENVVAR("MallocZeroOnAlloc=1"),
+		T_META_ENVVAR("MallocNanoZone=1"),
+		T_META_TAG_VM_NOT_PREFERRED)
+{
+	check_zeroing_mode();
+}
+
+T_DECL(malloc_zero_on_free, "Exercise zero-on-free mode",
+		T_META_ENVVAR("MallocZeroOnFree=1"),
+		T_META_ENVVAR("MallocNanoZone=1"),
+		T_META_TAG_VM_NOT_PREFERRED)
+{
+	check_zeroing_mode();
+}