--- Libc/Libc-1725.40.4/tests/regex/README
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,86 +0,0 @@
-###########################################################################
-# The testregex tests are not wired up yet
-###########################################################################
-
-The AT&T testregex program is available from:
-
-http://www2.research.att.com/~astopen/testregex/
-
-The so-called "testregex.c 2004-05-31" has a 2010 "what" string, so the
-versioning is weird.
-
-The original source code downloaded from the above URL is testregex.c.orig.
-testregex.c has a few modification, for example, to support our regex's
-"enhanced" mode, as well as pausing if the MallocStackLogging environment
-variable is set.
-
-The data files are in the datafiles subdirectory.  Several are part of the
-testregex distribution:
-
-basic.dat
-categorize.dat
-nullsubexpr.dat
-leftassoc.dat	(not included, since our implementation is right-associative)
-rightassoc.dat
-forcedassoc.dat
-repetition.dat
-
-The rest are from radars, adapted from the conformance tests, collected from
-internet sources or just created to test certain features.
-
-Easy to compile:
-
-% cc testregex.c -o testregex
-
-and easy to run:
-
-% testregex datafiles/union.dat
-TEST	testregex union (AT&T Research) 2010-06-10
-NOTE	regex
-NOTE	unsupported: AUGMENTED,SHELL,CLASS_ESCAPE,COMMENT,DELIMITED,DISCIPLINE,ESCAPE,LEFT,LENIENT,MULTIPLE,MULTIREF,MUSTDELIM,NULL,RIGHT,SHELL_DOT,SHELL_ESCAPED,SHELL_GROUP,SHELL_PATH,SPAN,regnexec,regsubcomp,redecomp
-TEST	testregex union, 8 tests, 0 errors
-
-(Some of the locale tests print extra NOTE lines when it switches into a
-different locale.)
-
-All datafile should run without error, except:
-
-regex-posix-unittest-1.1.dat
-14189743.dat
-
-The first has 8 failures:
-
-% testregex datafiles/regex-posix-unittest-1.1.dat
-TEST	testregex regex-posix-unittest-1.1 (AT&T Research) 2010-06-10
-NOTE	regex
-NOTE	unsupported: AUGMENTED,SHELL,CLASS_ESCAPE,COMMENT,DELIMITED,DISCIPLINE,ESCAPE,LEFT,LENIENT,MULTIPLE,MULTIREF,MUSTDELIM,NULL,RIGHT,SHELL_DOT,SHELL_ESCAPED,SHELL_GROUP,SHELL_PATH,SPAN,regnexec,regsubcomp,redecomp
-datafiles/regex-posix-unittest-1.1.dat:52: (^){0,3} versus a ERE failed: match was: (0,0)(?,?) expected: (0,0)(0,0)
-datafiles/regex-posix-unittest-1.1.dat:58: s(^|())e versus searchme ERE regexec failed: expected: (0,2)(1,1)(1,1)
-datafiles/regex-posix-unittest-1.1.dat:59: s(^|())e versus searchme ERE regexec failed: expected: (0,2)(1,1)(1,1)
-datafiles/regex-posix-unittest-1.1.dat:61: s(^)?e versus searchme ERE regexec failed: expected: (0,2)(?,?)
-datafiles/regex-posix-unittest-1.1.dat:66: ($)|() versus xxx ERE failed: match was: (3,3)(3,3)(?,?) expected: (0,0)(?,?)(0,0)
-datafiles/regex-posix-unittest-1.1.dat:67: $()|^() versus ac\n ERE failed: match was: (4,4)(4,4)(?,?) expected: (0,0)(?,?)(0,0)
-datafiles/regex-posix-unittest-1.1.dat:69: ($)?(.) versus __ ERE regexec failed: expected: (0,1)(?,?)(0,1)
-datafiles/regex-posix-unittest-1.1.dat:73: (.|$){2,} versus xx ERE failed: match was: (0,2)(2,2) expected: (0,2)(1,2)
-TEST	testregex regex-posix-unittest-1.1, 149 tests, 8 errors
-
-This seems to have something to do with repetitions or alterations of ^ and $.
-Doesn't look like I ever filed a radar.
-
-The second failure is from the corresponding radar:
-
-% testregex datafiles/14189743.dat
-TEST	testregex 14189743 (AT&T Research) 2010-06-10
-NOTE	regex
-NOTE	unsupported: AUGMENTED,SHELL,CLASS_ESCAPE,COMMENT,DELIMITED,DISCIPLINE,ESCAPE,LEFT,LENIENT,MULTIPLE,MULTIREF,MUSTDELIM,NULL,RIGHT,SHELL_DOT,SHELL_ESCAPED,SHELL_GROUP,SHELL_PATH,SPAN,regnexec,regsubcomp,redecomp
-datafiles/14189743.dat:2: ^((([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]\.)*)([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]$ versus nssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnss.edu ERE failed: match was: (0,70)(0,67)(0,67)(0,59)(67,69) expected: (0,1)
-datafiles/14189743.dat:3: ^((([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]\.)*)([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]$ versus ssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnss.edu ERE failed: match was: (0,69)(0,66)(0,66)(0,64)(66,68) expected: (0,1)
-datafiles/14189743.dat:4: ^((([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]\.)*)([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]$ versus snssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnss.edu ERE failed: match was: (0,68)(0,65)(0,65)(0,59)(65,67) expected: (0,1)
-datafiles/14189743.dat:5: ^((([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]\.)*)([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]$ versus nssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnss.edu ERE failed: match was: (0,67)(0,64)(0,64)(0,62)(64,66) expected: (0,1)
-datafiles/14189743.dat:6: ^((([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]\.)*)([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]$ versus ssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnss.edu ERE failed: match was: (0,66)(0,63)(0,63)(0,59)(63,65) expected: (0,1)
-datafiles/14189743.dat:7: ^((([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]\.)*)([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]$ versus snssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnss.edu ERE failed: match was: (0,65)(0,62)(0,62)(0,60)(62,64) expected: (0,1)
-datafiles/14189743.dat:8: ^((([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]\.)*)([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]$ versus nssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnss.edu ERE failed: match was: (0,64)(0,61)(0,61)(0,59)(61,63) expected: (0,1)
-datafiles/14189743.dat:9: ^((([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]\.)*)([[:alnum:]_][[:alnum:]-]{0,61})?[[:alnum:]]$ versus ssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnssnss.edu ERE failed: match was: (0,63)(0,60)(0,60)(0,58)(60,62) expected: (0,1)
-TEST	testregex 14189743, 8 tests, 8 errors
-
-Never had a chance to investigate.