Loading...
string/strcat.3 Libc-262 Libc-498.1.5
--- Libc/Libc-262/string/strcat.3
+++ Libc/Libc-498.1.5/string/strcat.3
@@ -34,22 +34,30 @@
 .\" SUCH DAMAGE.
 .\"
 .\"     @(#)strcat.3	8.1 (Berkeley) 6/4/93
-.\" $FreeBSD: src/lib/libc/string/strcat.3,v 1.9 2001/10/01 16:09:00 ru Exp $
+.\" $FreeBSD: src/lib/libc/string/strcat.3,v 1.13 2002/09/06 11:24:06 tjr Exp $
 .\"
 .Dd June 4, 1993
 .Dt STRCAT 3
 .Os
 .Sh NAME
-.Nm strcat
+.Nm strcat ,
+.Nm strncat
 .Nd concatenate strings
 .Sh LIBRARY
 .Lb libc
 .Sh SYNOPSIS
 .In string.h
 .Ft char *
-.Fn strcat "char *s" "const char *append"
+.Fo strcat
+.Fa "char *restrict s1"
+.Fa "const char *restrict s2"
+.Fc
 .Ft char *
-.Fn strncat "char *s" "const char *append" "size_t count"
+.Fo strncat
+.Fa "char *restrict s1"
+.Fa "const char *restrict s2"
+.Fa "size_t n"
+.Fc
 .Sh DESCRIPTION
 The
 .Fn strcat
@@ -57,22 +65,22 @@
 .Fn strncat
 functions
 append a copy of the null-terminated string
-.Fa append
+.Fa s2
 to the end of the null-terminated string
-.Fa s ,
+.Fa s1 ,
 then add a terminating
 .Ql \e0 .
 The string
-.Fa s
+.Fa s1
 must have sufficient space to hold the result.
 .Pp
 The
 .Fn strncat
 function
 appends not more than
-.Fa count
+.Fa n
 characters from
-.Fa append ,
+.Fa s2 ,
 and then adds a terminating
 .Ql \e0 .
 .Sh RETURN VALUES
@@ -82,7 +90,65 @@
 .Fn strncat
 functions
 return the pointer
-.Fa s .
+.Fa s1 .
+.Sh SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS
+The
+.Fn strcat
+function is easily misused in a manner
+which enables malicious users to arbitrarily change
+a running program's functionality through a buffer overflow attack.
+(See
+the FSA.)
+.Pp
+Avoid using
+.Fn strcat .
+Instead, use
+.Fn strncat
+or
+.Fn strlcat
+and ensure that no more characters are copied to the destination buffer
+than it can hold.
+.Pp
+Note that
+.Fn strncat
+can also be problematic.
+It may be a security concern for a string to be truncated at all.
+Since the truncated string will not be as long as the original,
+it may refer to a completely different resource
+and usage of the truncated resource
+could result in very incorrect behavior.
+Example:
+.Bd -literal
+void
+foo(const char *arbitrary_string)
+{
+	char onstack[8] = "";
+
+#if defined(BAD)
+	/*
+	 * This first strcat is bad behavior.  Do not use strcat!
+	 */
+	(void)strcat(onstack, arbitrary_string);	/* BAD! */
+#elif defined(BETTER)
+	/*
+	 * The following two lines demonstrate better use of
+	 * strncat().
+	 */
+	(void)strncat(onstack, arbitrary_string,
+	    sizeof(onstack) - strlen(onstack) - 1);
+#elif defined(BEST)
+	/*
+	 * These lines are even more robust due to testing for
+	 * truncation.
+	 */
+	if (strlen(arbitrary_string) + 1 >
+	    sizeof(onstack) - strlen(onstack))
+		err(1, "onstack would be truncated");
+	(void)strncat(onstack, arbitrary_string,
+	    sizeof(onstack) - strlen(onstack) - 1);
+#endif
+}
+.Ed
 .Sh SEE ALSO
 .Xr bcopy 3 ,
 .Xr memccpy 3 ,